2024-02-23 波音 747 防雷保護(hù)由于快速退化而必須檢查
2024-02-23 12:04:21

波音 747 防雷保護(hù)由于快速退化而必須檢查

莫莉·拉塞爾

所有波音747飛機(jī)都將被要求在某些部件開(kāi)裂后檢查其油箱防雷功能。

A Boeing 747 aircraft is used for testing a new Rolls Royce engine.
照片:Digital Masters Imaging |Shutterstock 百葉窗

總結(jié)

  • 美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局(FAA)已經(jīng)為波音747發(fā)布了一項(xiàng)緊急適航指令(AD),以解決對(duì)防雷系統(tǒng)開(kāi)裂和安全功能受損的擔(dān)憂。

  • AD涵蓋全球362架現(xiàn)役飛機(jī),預(yù)計(jì)檢查時(shí)間為兩到三天,以防止對(duì)飛行公眾造成潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。

美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局(FAA)發(fā)布了一項(xiàng)適航指令(AD),因?yàn)槿藗儞?dān)心波音747特定防雷部件的磨損。

對(duì)開(kāi)裂的擔(dān)憂

據(jù)FlightGlobal報(bào)道,在FAA收到某些部件出現(xiàn)故障或開(kāi)始破裂的報(bào)告后,所有現(xiàn)役747飛機(jī)都將被要求檢查其油箱上的防雷功能,從而限制了防止燃油管火花進(jìn)入油箱的安全功能的有效性。

美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局(FAA)的AD已于周三發(fā)布,作為最終規(guī)則發(fā)布,該機(jī)構(gòu)敦促航空公司盡快檢查所有747變體。檢查預(yù)計(jì)需要兩到三天。

“美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局發(fā)現(xiàn),在采用該規(guī)則之前,對(duì)飛行公眾的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)是合理的。這是一個(gè)緊迫的安全問(wèn)題,因?yàn)樗腥剂瞎┙o防雷功能現(xiàn)在都有妥協(xié)的跡象。

Closeup photo of a Boeing 747 engine taken apart.

照片:mgw89 來(lái)自 Wikimedia Commons。

在與Simple Flying分享的一份聲明中,波音發(fā)言人指出,它正在與FAA就此問(wèn)題進(jìn)行溝通。

“波音公司支持美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空管理局的立即通過(guò)規(guī)則,該規(guī)則強(qiáng)制要求我們向運(yùn)營(yíng)商提供指導(dǎo)。我們繼續(xù)與美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局和我們的客戶就此事進(jìn)行溝通。

預(yù)防問(wèn)題

AD涵蓋全球362架現(xiàn)役飛機(jī),從伊朗伊斯蘭共和國(guó)空軍服役的-100到1月份交付給阿特拉斯航空公司的最后一架-8F。盡管-8機(jī)身的年齡相對(duì)較小,但美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局指出,它已經(jīng)在747-8上發(fā)現(xiàn)了隔離火花的部件周?chē)耐耆芽p。

aircraft lightning

相關(guān)

當(dāng)飛機(jī)被閃電擊中時(shí)會(huì)發(fā)生什么?

當(dāng)閃電擊中飛機(jī)時(shí),通常不會(huì)引起關(guān)注。

油箱安全系統(tǒng)的故障可能會(huì)使飛機(jī)無(wú)法充分抵御雷擊,在某些情況下可能導(dǎo)致油箱爆炸。美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局補(bǔ)充說(shuō),

“發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)燃油供給系統(tǒng)的防雷功能可能會(huì)在未被發(fā)現(xiàn)的情況下失效。這可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致沒(méi)有防雷功能。

3897269277_4ce706f3fe_oTrans World Airlines (TWA) Boeing 747-100 Seen on approach to runway 08R at London Gatwick airport, England on 23rd July 1994

照片:Dean Morley |Flickr的

在Simple Flying上獲取所有最新的航空新聞

值得注意的是,-100變體747參與了兩次備受矚目的油箱爆炸。1976 年,一架伊朗空軍 747-100 (5-283) 在接近馬德里-巴拉哈斯機(jī)場(chǎng) (MAD) 時(shí)墜毀,原因是雷擊穿過(guò)機(jī)身點(diǎn)燃了左外側(cè)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)中的燃油蒸氣。爆炸導(dǎo)致左翼解體,擊落飛機(jī)及其17名乘客。

直到 1996 年 TWA 800 航班墜毀后,美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局才對(duì)油箱安全功能提出更嚴(yán)格的要求。美國(guó)國(guó)家運(yùn)輸安全委員會(huì)(NTSB)在調(diào)查中強(qiáng)調(diào),短路引發(fā)的中央油箱中的燃油蒸氣點(diǎn)燃是事故的最可能原因。

美國(guó)聯(lián)邦航空局此前也發(fā)布了類(lèi)似的廣告,747-400 和 747-8 運(yùn)營(yíng)商警告說(shuō),水平穩(wěn)定器油箱內(nèi)的磨損會(huì)導(dǎo)致 2022 年的不安全情況。該廣告于 2023 年 1 月生效,涵蓋近 150 架在美國(guó)注冊(cè)的飛機(jī)。

Grounded Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft parked at Boeing field in April 2020.

相關(guān)

悲慘事件如何影響飛機(jī)認(rèn)證要求

Boeing 747 Lightning Protection Must Be Inspected Due To Fast Degradation

BYMOLLY RUSSELL

All Boeing 747s will be required to have their fuel tank lightning protection features inspected following reports of cracking on certain components.

A Boeing 747 aircraft is used for testing a new Rolls Royce engine.
Photo: Digital Masters Imaging | Shutterstock

SUMMARY

  •  The FAA has issued an urgent airworthiness directive (AD) for Boeing 747s to address concerns about cracking and compromised safety features on the lightning protection systems.

  •  The AD covers 362 active aircraft globally, with inspections expected to take between two and three days to prevent potential risks to the flying public.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) amid concerns over the wear on specific Boeing 747 lightning protection components.

Concerns over cracking

As reported by FlightGlobal, all 747s in active service will be required to have the lightning protection features on their fuel tanks inspected after the FAA received reports that some components had failed or begun to crack, limiting the effectiveness of the safety features that prevent sparks in the fuel tubes entering fuel tanks.

Ordered on Wednesday, the FAA’s AD has been issued as a final rule, with the agency urging airlines to inspect all 747 variants as soon as possible. Inspections are expected to take between two and three days.

“The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule. This is an urgent safety issue, as all fuel feed lightning protection features now have evidence of compromise.”

Closeup photo of a Boeing 747 engine taken apart.

Photo:mgw89 via Wikimedia Commons.

In a statement shared with Simple Flying, a Boeing spokesperson noted that it was in communication with the FAA regarding the issue,

“Boeing supports the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s Immediately Adopted Rule, which makes mandatory the guidance we have provided to operators. We remain in communication with the FAA and our customers on this matter.”

Preventing problems

The AD covers 362 active aircraft worldwide, ranging from the -100 in service with the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Air Force to the last -8F delivered to Atlas Air in January. Despite the relatively young age of the -8 airframe, the FAA noted it had found a complete crack around components that isolated sparks on a 747-8.

aircraft lightning

RELATED

What Happens When A Plane Is Hit By Lightning?

When lightning does strike an aircraft, it is often not a cause for concern.

A failure of the fuel tank’s safety systems could leave an aircraft without adequate protection from lightning strikes, potentially leading to a fuel tank explosion under certain conditions. The FAA added,

“The lightning protection features for the engine fuel feed system could fail without being detected. This could result in no lightning protection features remaining.”

3897269277_4ce706f3fe_oTrans World Airlines (TWA) Boeing 747-100 Seen on approach to runway 08R at London Gatwick airport, England on 23rd July 1994

Photo: Dean Morley | Flickr

Get all the latest aviation news right here on Simple Flying

The -100 variant 747 has notably been involved in two high-profile fuel tank explosions. In 1976, an Iranian Air Force 747-100 (5-283) crashed on approach to Madrid-Barajas Airport (MAD) after a lightning strike passing through the fuselage ignited the fuel vapor in the outer left-hand engine. The explosion caused the left wing to disintegrate, bringing down the aircraft and its 17 occupants.

Stricter requirements for fuel tank safety features were not pushed by the FAA until 1996, following the crash of TWA Flight 800. In its investigation, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) highlighted the ignition of fuel vapors in the center tank triggered by a short circuit as the most likely cause of the accident.

Similar ADs have been issued by the FAA previously, with 747-400s and 747-8s operators cautioned about wear within the horizontal stabilizer fuel tanks causing unsafe conditions in 2022. The AD came into effect in January 2023, covering almost 150 aircraft registered in the US.

Grounded Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft parked at Boeing field in April 2020.

RELATED

How Tragic Events Have Shaped Aircraft Certification Requirements

The FAA design rulings incur hefty costs to the manufacturers.

What are your thoughts on the FAA’s latest 747 airworthiness directive? Let us know in the comments.

  • 787-8 Dreamliner

    Boeing
    • Business Type:

    • Planemaker

    • Key Product Lines:

    • Boeing 737, Boeing 747, Boeing 757, Boeing 767, Boeing 777, Boeing 787

    • Headquarters Location:

    • Chicago, USA

    • CEO:

    • Dave Calhoun

    • Date Founded:

    • 1916-07-15

    • Stock Code:

    • BA

      上一篇:2023-02-23 防雷技術(shù) (LPT) 全球戰(zhàn)略業(yè)務(wù)報(bào)告 2023年
      下一篇:2024-02-23 新型風(fēng)力渦輪機(jī)葉片涂層,增強(qiáng)防雷保護(hù)